"What Is This Thing Called Love?"
We have established that the connection between gays
and musicals has existed for some time. But what makes so many gays gaga over
musicals? It is one thing to document the history of a love affair, but it is quite
another to dissect the reasons for it. We could all too easily stray into a deep
psychological discussion, something that this writer has neither the credentials nor the
inclination to do. To my knowledge, no one has published a scientific analysis of the gay
musical buff's mind (and I pity the yutz who tries it), but there isn't a gay
musicalmaniac in existence who would hesitate to venture an opinion on why we love
musicals.
I dug up the few written sources and canvassed the troops, talking to
everyone from Broadway production assistants to sing-along buddies in piano bars.
Granted, it was the most informal of surveys, but it revealed some points of common
experience.
Is It Genetic?
Science may never prove a genetic cause for gay musicalmania, but my survey indicates
that the signs appear at an early age. For some, it begins with the music they grew up
with in their parent's homes, places where the only rock collection was in the garden. A
lucky few were taken to the theatre from an early age and caught the bug directly.
In his autobiography, Jerry Herman writes
that he and his family played and sang showtunes together every night. As a child, he was taken
to the great musicals of the 1940s and 50s, and decided that he had to write musicals
after seeing Ethel Merman in Annie Get Your Gun.
Others got their start by seeing musicals on the big screen. For example,
my mother still recalls the day her four-year old son refused
to leave the theatre after seeing his first musical film, Mary Poppins (Disney
1964). Only after a second Spoonful of Sugar
could I be coaxed into going home so I was demanding encores right
off the bat!
As a child, I amassed a sizable collection of Disney
storybook albums that combined soundtrack selections with narration cementing my
lifelong belief that the best stories are told with songs. However, things really took off
when I saw a 1969 re-release of My Fair Lady (Warner 1964). Shopping for the
soundtrack the next day, I discovered an "Original Cast Album" of
the same score with none other than "Mary Poppins" in the lead! At $4.99 a
piece, my parents let me buy both if only they had known what they were getting
into! I fell in love with both recordings, and began collecting cast albums and
soundtracks in earnest. All at the tender age of ten!
An elementary school classmate of mine provides a more extreme
case. He was a talented musician, the only person in our class who had seen a
Broadway show, and one of the most outrageous musical queens I've known at any age.
-
Whenever The Wizard of Oz was on TV (yes
kiddies, there was a time before VCR's when one could only watch a movie as it was
broadcast!), this boy led the girls in schoolyard chants of, "Lions
and tigers and bears, oh my!"
-
When Rodgers & Hammerstein's Cinderella (CBS
1957/1965) was shown, he would run about confronting boys and girls alike with the vivid
suggestion, "You'll wear a gown of satin jade, and me I'll be in a pink
brocade!"
-
Best of all was the Sunday mass when he used the melody from Gypsy's
"You Gotta Have a Gimmick" as a pipe organ communion meditation and got away
with it. (I've always suspected the nuns secretly loved the way he pulled that
off.)
Since musicalmania can start so early, it may be that, like homosexuality,
it is not something we choose; rather, it is something we sooner or later realize we
have within us. However, young M.Q.I.T.'s (Musical Queens In Training) are not proof
that gay musicalmania is genetic. A hint, perhaps, but not proof.
Mania By Choice?
While my survey could not prove genetics are an issue in gay musicalmania, my
respondents were in universal agreement on one point musicals are tangible, extant
regions of time and space within which the impossible can happen. Or, to use less formal
terminology, we love musicals because they are faaaaaaabulous!
The domains we are believed to
cluster in -- theater, music, design, fashion, performance, decoration,
arts, even personal care -- embody elements of play, spectacle, and
beautification. They reflect what one study terms our "ongoing search
for a link between playfulness and seriousness in everyday life. In the
view of modern Western cultures, at least, our clan's life work is deeply
tied to the invention and production of opportunities for bliss, in the
broadest sense. It is a prime gift we bring the societies where we live.
- David Nimmons, The Soul Beneath the Skin: The Unseen Hearts and
Habits of Gay Men (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2002), p. 169.
How wonderful to imagine
a world where spontaneous song and dance occur on a crowded city street
or a secluded mountainside a world in which talent, style and guts are all you
need, plus "faith, hope, and a little bit o' luck." In such a never-never
land, even homosexuals can imagine a life filled
with the forbidden joys of "moonlight and music and love and romance."
To borrow Dr. Frankenfurter's phrase from The Rocky Horror Picture Show (Fox
1974), in musicals we don't merely "dream it" we can "be it."
Many genres allow one to escape reality and find vicarious joy in the adventures of others, but nothing has the same stylish, witty, melodious fun
that classic musicals do. The musical is where all art forms (literature, dance, drama,
music, the visual arts, etc.) come together to form as complete an artistic expression as
Western civilization can lay claim to.
Accessibility is a key issue here. Musicals touch the
widest possible audience, including many left cold by other narrative forms. In the
musical Les Miserables, Jean Valjean comes to life for millions who would never
read Victor Hugo's ponderous novel.
Grand opera and ballet are too big, too stylized to
have the same effect. A good musical is the realm of human beings, while opera and ballet
are all too often the realm of characters who belong to another species. Dolly, Tevya,
Evita, Pippin, Annie, Curly, the Phantom and Max Biyalistock are all terribly, wonderfully,
and undeniably human. We recognize their feelings and in the process can reach a better
understanding of ourselves.
Dying swans in
tutus or overweight tenors wooing porcine sopranos cannot inspire such
understanding -- at least not in most auditors. Certainly, such
understanding occurs in non-musical dramas, but the effect can be more visceral and
immediate when music is part of the package.
As the fight for gay rights continues into
the 21st Century, musicals remain a much needed source of release and recreation. Hell,
even when AIDS is conquered and gays are fully enfranchised, we'll still need to have
fun!
But will the musical still be there for us?
Next: Are Musicals (and their Fans)
Doomed?